About this blog

  • Here we welcome a free and open exchange of opinions and commentary on the public policy issues facing New Hampshire. Our mission is to raise new ideas and improve public policy debates in our state through quality information and analysis.
Subscribe by email:

Enter your email address:

« This week's policy "must-reads" - March 9, 2012 | Main | This week's policy "must-reads" - March 16, 2012 »

March 15, 2012


Any consideration of the restrictions these mapping services place on the public and the press in terms of access and sharing?

Why are agencies paying for services that restrict access and limit the sharing of data -when the intent of the service is to get the data to the public?

With existing free technology and access to a table of crime data, most small newspapers and eight graders can map crime data. All the public needs is full open access. Crime maps are good and useful, but data transparency is much better.

Colin Drane

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)