The proposal to legalize expanded gambling in New Hampshire has been put at the center of this year's budget debate, ever since Gov. Hassan suggested using revenue from casino license fees in the state budget. While expanded gambling has been considered numerous times in recent years in New Hampshire, this year's debate is getting increased scrutiny, given the governor's support and the $80 million in potential revenue she's counting on to balance her two-year spending plan.
The Center recently updated its model of the potential impact of expanded gambling on New Hampshire, including estimates of state tax revenues, social costs of problem gambling and the potential effect of new casino development in Massachusetts. Our new analysis suggests that at a tax rate of 30 percent of less (which is the rate spelled out in the major gambling bill now in the Legislature), casino gambling would yield no net long-term benefit to the state.
Our recent report probes some of the other variables in the gambling policy debate, including license fees for developers, investment requirements and the potential jobs created by new gambling facilities. Read the full report here.
Recent Comments